An abandoned settlement on a remote island. One hundred and fifteen men, women, and children vanished, seemingly into thin air. Left behind, a single, cryptic word carved into a post: “CROATOAN”.¹ This stark image forms the heart of America’s oldest unsolved mystery, a profound enigma that has haunted historians, archaeologists, and amateur sleuths for over four centuries.¹ The questions surrounding the fate of the Roanoke Colony, established in 1587 on the coast of present-day North Carolina, are as compelling today as they were when Governor John White returned in 1590 to find his colony gone, with no bodies, no clear signs of struggle, and no graves to mark their passing.¹

The story of the Lost Colony is more than just a tale of disappearance. It is a narrative woven from the grand ambitions of Elizabethan England, the brutal realities of the New World, the complex and often tragic interactions between European settlers and Indigenous peoples, and the tantalizingly few clues that have fueled centuries of speculation. The word “CROATOAN” itself, far from being a simple marker, became the pivotal point around which countless theories would revolve, transforming a disappearance into an enduring historical puzzle.¹ Understanding this mystery requires a journey back to an era of global upheaval and imperial dreams, a time when the allure of uncharted territories and untold riches beckoned European powers across the vast Atlantic.

An Era of Ambition: England’s New World Aspirations

The late 15th and 16th centuries witnessed a seismic shift in the European worldview, often termed the Age of Discovery. Christopher Columbus’s voyage in 1492, followed by Vasco da Gama’s establishment of a sea route to India in 1498, irrevocably altered the geopolitical landscape.¹ European nations, including Portugal, Spain, France, the Netherlands, and England, found themselves in a fervent race to explore, claim, and exploit the resources of newly encountered lands across the globe.¹ This era was characterized by an insatiable hunger for wealth, strategic advantage, and the expansion of imperial influence.

Amidst this intense competition, England, under the Protestant Queen Elizabeth I, was eager to challenge the burgeoning might of Catholic Spain, then the world’s most formidable empire.¹ Sir Walter Raleigh, a charismatic courtier, explorer, and a prominent figure in Elizabethan politics, emerged as a key proponent of English colonization in North America.⁵ His vision was multifaceted: establishing an English foothold in the New World would not only provide a base from which to harass Spanish treasure fleets sailing from the Caribbean but also secure valuable resources for England and significantly expand its imperial reach.¹ Raleigh’s experiences with English colonial efforts in Ireland further solidified his belief in the potential of overseas expansion.¹

In March 1584, Queen Elizabeth I granted Raleigh a royal charter, or patent, authorizing him to “discover, search, find out, and view such remote, heathen and barbarous lands, countries, and territories, not actually possessed of any Christian Prince, nor inhabited by Christian People”.¹ A critical condition of this charter was the establishment of a permanent colony within seven years, lest his rights be revoked.¹ Though Raleigh himself was prevented by the Queen from leading expeditions directly, he assembled a team of capable individuals to bring his ambitious plans to fruition. This group included his cousin Richard Hakluyt, who was instrumental in gathering financial and political backing for the venture; Thomas Harriot, a distinguished scientist and mathematician tasked with documenting the new territories and their resources; John White, a skilled artist and cartographer whose role was to create a visual record of the New World’s landscapes, flora, fauna, and people; and Simon Fernandez, an experienced Portuguese pilot chosen to navigate the treacherous transatlantic voyages.¹

The Roanoke venture, therefore, was not merely a speculative land grab. It represented a sophisticated, multi-layered enterprise reflecting the broader intellectual and imperial currents of the Elizabethan age. The motivations were a complex blend of geopolitical strategy aimed at undermining Spanish power, economic aspirations tied to resource extraction and privateering, a genuine scientific curiosity embodied by Harriot’s work, and an effort to visually document and understand the “New World” through White’s artistry. This intricate interplay of objectives underscores the calculated and ambitious nature of England’s early forays into American colonization.

To provide a clear chronological framework for the events that unfolded, the following timeline outlines the key developments in the early Roanoke voyages:

Table 1: Timeline of Key Roanoke Events (1584-1590)

Year	Key Event	Notable Figures Involved	Brief Significance
1584	Amadas & Barlowe reconnaissance expedition lands on Outer Banks; initial contact with Native Americans.	Sir Walter Raleigh, Philip Amadas, Arthur Barlowe, Manteo, Wanchese	First English exploration of the region; establishes initial, mostly positive, Native American relations.
April 1585	Sir Richard Grenville’s expedition arrives to establish the first colony.	Raleigh, Sir Richard Grenville, Ralph Lane, Thomas Harriot, John White, Manteo, Wanchese	First attempt at a permanent English settlement in North America.
July 1585	“Silver Cup Incident”; English burn Aquascogoc village and crops in retaliation.	Grenville, Lane	Significant escalation of conflict with local Native Americans; damages relations.
June 1586	Ralph Lane’s colony, facing hardship and conflict, abandons Roanoke with Sir Francis Drake.	Lane, King Wingina/Pemisapan, Sir Francis Drake	Failure of the first, primarily military-style, colonial attempt due to supply issues and Native hostility.
July 1587	John White’s colony, including families, arrives; controversially forced to settle at Roanoke Island.	John White, Simon Fernandez, Elinor Dare, Ananias Dare	Second attempt at colonization, intended for Chesapeake Bay, marks the beginning of the “Lost Colony” saga.
August 1587	Virginia Dare born (first English child in Americas); Governor John White departs for England for supplies.	John White, Virginia Dare	Symbolic birth amidst growing concerns; Governor leaves, expecting a swift return with aid.
August 1590	John White returns after a three-year delay to find the colony deserted; “CROATOAN” carving found.	John White	The central mystery of the Lost Colony begins; colonists have vanished, leaving a cryptic clue.

The First Footprints: Early Expeditions to Roanoke (1584-1586)

Sir Walter Raleigh’s vision began to take concrete shape in April 1584, when he dispatched two ships under the command of Philip Amadas and Arthur Barlowe on a reconnaissance mission.¹ Their objective was not to establish a full-fledged colony but to scout potential locations along the North American coast for future settlement.⁶ In July 1584, they made landfall on the Outer Banks of present-day North Carolina, likely on Hatteras Island, and formally claimed the territory for Queen Elizabeth I.¹

Initial interactions with the local Algonquian-speaking peoples, specifically the Secotan tribe, were largely amicable. The English accounts describe trading and gift exchanges with figures such as Granganimeo, the brother of the local king, Wingina.¹ These early encounters were crucial in shaping perceptions back in England. Amadas and Barlowe returned in the autumn of 1584, not only with glowing reports of a “most pleasant and fertile ground” ⁵ but also with two Native American men: Manteo of the Croatoan people and Wanchese of the Roanoac people.¹ Their presence in England and the enthusiastic descriptions of the New World were instrumental in garnering further support for Raleigh’s colonial ambitions.

Buoyed by this initial success, Raleigh organized a more substantial expedition in 1585. This venture, led by his cousin Sir Richard Grenville, comprised seven ships and approximately 600 men, predominantly soldiers and sailors, and aimed to establish England’s first true colony.¹ Manteo and Wanchese accompanied this group, returning to their homeland.⁶ Among the key personnel were Ralph Lane, an experienced soldier designated as the colony’s governor, along with Thomas Harriot and John White, tasked with their scientific and artistic documentation.¹ The fleet departed in April 1585 but encountered a severe storm in the Atlantic, which damaged several vessels and destroyed one, necessitating a stop in Puerto Rico for repairs.⁶ They finally reached Roanoke Island on June 26, 1585.⁶

Despite the initial positive reports from the 1584 voyage, relations with the Native Americans soon deteriorated. A pivotal moment occurred when a silver cup went missing, and the English suspected the inhabitants of the nearby village of Aquascogoc.¹ Governor Grenville’s reaction was swift and brutal: on July 16, 1585, he ordered the village burned and its crops destroyed.¹ This act of aggression irrevocably damaged the fragile trust that had been established and signaled a shift towards hostility. Nevertheless, a short time later, Grenville managed to conclude a treaty with Granganimeo, allowing the English to establish their settlement near a Secotan village on Roanoke Island.¹ In late August 1585, Grenville sailed back to England, leaving Ralph Lane in command of about 107 men, with the promise of returning with more supplies and colonists.¹ On his return journey, Grenville captured a Spanish ship, which proved to be the expedition’s sole financial gain.¹

The colony under Ralph Lane, established in 1585, faced immense challenges from the outset. Composed mainly of soldiers ill-suited to agriculture, the settlers were heavily reliant on provisions from England and trade with the Native Americans for their sustenance.¹ The critical resupply fleet that Grenville had promised was unfortunately intercepted and attacked by Spanish ships, leaving the Roanoke colonists in a precarious situation.¹ As their own supplies dwindled, their dependence on the local tribes grew, placing a strain on indigenous resources and further fueling resentment.

Compounding these difficulties was the devastating impact of European diseases. Smallpox, measles, and typhoid, to which the Native Americans had no immunity, swept through local communities, causing widespread death and social disruption.¹ Among the victims was Granganimeo, the Secotan leader who had shown friendliness towards the English.¹ The catastrophic loss of life and the mysterious nature of these illnesses undoubtedly influenced Native perceptions of the newcomers. King Wingina, who later adopted the name Pemisapan, became increasingly wary of the English presence and began to orchestrate a large-scale attack to oust them.¹ However, Ralph Lane was alerted to this plan by Skiko, the son of another tribal leader. On June 1, 1586, Lane launched a preemptive strike, attacking the Secotan settlement, killing Wingina/Pemisapan and many of his warriors.¹

Just a week after this violent confrontation, a large fleet commanded by the famed English privateer Sir Francis Drake unexpectedly arrived off the coast.¹ Drake, returning from raids in the Spanish Caribbean, offered to resupply the beleaguered colony. However, before significant aid could be transferred, a powerful hurricane struck the area, scattering Drake’s fleet and damaging many of his ships.¹ Faced with acute food shortages, escalating conflict with the Native population, and the recent natural disaster, Lane and his exhausted, disheartened colonists made the decision to abandon Roanoke. They accepted Drake’s offer of passage and returned to England in June 1586.¹ Ironically, Raleigh’s long-awaited supply ship arrived at Roanoke only a short time after Lane’s departure, finding the settlement deserted.¹ Grenville himself returned later with more men, only to find the site abandoned again. He left a small detachment of 15 men to maintain an English claim before he too sailed for England.¹

The failure of this first colonial attempt underscored the immense difficulties inherent in such ventures. The English had gravely underestimated the logistical complexities of sustaining a remote outpost across the Atlantic. Furthermore, their interactions with the indigenous populations were often characterized by misunderstanding, cultural insensitivity, and violence, as exemplified by the silver cup incident and Lane’s subsequent actions. The combination of unreliable supply lines and deteriorating Anglo-Native relations proved fatal to Raleigh’s initial endeavor, offering stark lessons about the prerequisites for successful colonization.

A Fateful Venture: The 1587 “Lost Colony” and John White’s Gamble

Despite the costly failure of the 1585-1586 Lane colony, Sir Walter Raleigh remained undeterred in his ambition to establish a permanent English presence in Virginia. Learning from the previous attempt, he envisioned a different kind of settlement for his next venture. Instead of a military outpost primarily composed of soldiers, the new colony would consist of families – men, women, and children – with the intention of creating a self-sustaining agricultural community.¹ John White, the artist who had accompanied the earlier expeditions and meticulously documented the region, was appointed as the Governor of this new enterprise.¹

In May 1587, a group of approximately 115 to 150 colonists ¹ set sail from England aboard three ships.¹ Once again, the controversial Simon Fernandez served as the chief pilot for the fleet.¹ Their intended destination was not Roanoke Island but the Chesapeake Bay area, which was considered to offer better harbors and more fertile land.¹ The expedition also carried Manteo, the Croatoan Native American who had been a consistent ally to the English, and another Native American named Towaye, who were to be returned to their people.¹

However, the voyage took an unexpected and fateful turn. Upon reaching the Outer Banks of North Carolina on July 22, 1587, Simon Fernandez abruptly refused to sail further north to the Chesapeake Bay.¹ His motives remain debated; some historians suggest he was eager to depart for the Caribbean to engage in privateering against Spanish shipping, while others believe he was concerned about the lateness of the season and the risks of navigating unfamiliar waters further.¹ Regardless of his reasons, Fernandez’s decision effectively forced the colonists to disembark at Roanoke Island, a place many, including Governor White, likely wished to avoid given its troubled history.¹ This episode highlighted a potential weakness in White’s leadership, as he was unable to compel Fernandez to adhere to the original plan.¹

Reluctantly, the colonists began the arduous task of re-establishing a settlement on Roanoke. They found that the fort and cottages built by Ralph Lane’s men two years prior were still largely standing, albeit in disrepair, and they set about repairing them for shelter.¹ An ominous discovery soon followed: they learned from friendly Croatoan individuals that the 15 men left behind by Sir Richard Grenville in 1586 to maintain an English presence had all perished. Most were reportedly killed in conflicts with hostile local tribes, possibly the Secotan, while a few may have attempted to escape by boat and were lost at sea.¹

The precariousness of their situation was starkly emphasized on July 28, 1587, just days after their arrival. A colonist named George Howe was ambushed and brutally killed by Secotan warriors while crabbing alone. His body was found pierced by sixteen arrows, a clear and terrifying message that the local animosity towards the English had not abated.¹ In response, Governor White, seeking to assert authority and perhaps secure a measure of peace, turned to Manteo and the Croatoan. They identified Howe’s attackers as belonging to Wingina/Pemisapan’s former Secotan faction. White attempted to open negotiations with the Secotan, but when no reply was forthcoming by the deadline he set, he decided on a retaliatory strike.¹

On the morning of August 9, 1587, White led an armed party to attack the Secotan village of Dasemunkepeuc. In the pre-dawn gloom, however, they made a disastrous error. The villagers they attacked were not the hostile Secotan warriors they sought but friendly Croatoan individuals who had gone to the abandoned village to gather salvaged corn and other crops.¹ Several Croatoan were killed or wounded before the mistake was realized. This tragic miscalculation severely damaged the colonists’ relationship with the Croatoan, their most crucial, and perhaps only, reliable Native American allies.¹

Amidst this backdrop of hardship, fear, and diplomatic blunders, there were moments of new life. On August 18, 1587, Eleanor White Dare, Governor John White’s daughter and wife of colonist Ananias Dare, gave birth to a daughter.¹ Named Virginia Dare, she holds the distinction of being the first English Christian child born in the Americas.¹ Shortly thereafter, another colonist, Margery Harvey, also gave birth, though the name and gender of this child are not recorded.¹

These births, however, could not alleviate the growing despair. The colony faced dwindling food supplies, the looming threat of a harsh winter, the effects of a severe drought that afflicted the region, and the persistent danger of hostile Native American encounters.¹ Recognizing their dire circumstances and the urgent need for reinforcement and provisions, the colonists collectively implored Governor White to return to England to plead their case to Sir Walter Raleigh and organize a relief mission.¹ White was deeply reluctant to leave his daughter, newborn granddaughter, and the rest of the colony in such a perilous environment.¹ Yet, persuaded by their unanimous request and the gravity of their situation, he eventually consented. In late August 1587, likely around August 27, John White set sail for England, expecting to return within a few months.¹ As he looked back at the shores of Roanoke, he could not have known he was seeing his family and his colony for the very last time. The 1587 venture was thus marred from its inception by a cascade of misfortune and misjudgment, beginning with Fernandez’s deviation from the intended destination, compounded by the inherited hostility from Lane’s earlier interactions, and critically undermined by White’s own tragic error in attacking the Croatoan. These events left the fledgling settlement isolated, vulnerable, and dependent on a swift return by their governor.

Vanished into Thin Air: The Deserted Colony and the “CROATOAN” Clue

Upon his arrival in England in late 1587, John White found a nation in turmoil, bracing for an imminent invasion by the Spanish Armada.¹ Queen Elizabeth I, prioritizing national defense, issued a decree forbidding all seaworthy ships from leaving English ports.¹ This wartime measure effectively trapped White in England, thwarting his desperate attempts to organize a swift return to Roanoke with the desperately needed supplies and reinforcements.¹ Sir Walter Raleigh’s influence at court had also diminished by this time, further complicating efforts to fund and equip a relief expedition.¹¹ Consequently, three long and agonizing years passed before White could finally secure passage back to America.¹

It was not until mid-August 1590 that White, having managed to join a privateering fleet bound for the West Indies that agreed to make a stop at Roanoke, finally approached the shores of the Outer Banks.¹ The date was, poignantly, near his granddaughter Virginia Dare’s third birthday.³ As they neared Roanoke Island, the sight of smoke rising from the island initially kindled a flicker of hope in White and his companions.¹ However, this hope quickly turned to dismay.

Upon landing and making their way to the site of the 1587 settlement, they found it utterly deserted.¹ The area was overgrown with grass and weeds, indicating that it had been abandoned for a considerable period.¹ The houses, which the colonists had painstakingly repaired or built, had been systematically dismantled and removed, not burned or violently destroyed.¹ There were no human remains, no graves, and no signs of a battle or struggle that might explain the colonists’ absence.¹ It was as if the entire community of some 115 souls had simply vanished.

The search party did, however, discover two crucial carvings. On a tree near the water’s edge, the letters “CRO” were etched into the bark.¹ More significantly, at the entrance to the now-empty settlement, which had been enclosed by a defensive palisade of tall tree trunks, the word “CROATOAN” was found carved in “fayre Capitall letters” into one of the main posts.¹ Critically, White noted the absence of a Maltese cross, a symbol he had specifically instructed the colonists to carve above any message if they were forced to leave due to danger or distress.¹ The only other items found were some heavy objects, such as iron bars, two pigs of lead, and four iron cannon pieces (fowlers), scattered about.¹ Several chests, three of which belonged to White himself and had been carefully buried by the colonists, were found dug up and broken open, their contents spoiled and looted, though items of no apparent use to the local Native Americans were left undisturbed.¹

White interpreted these findings, particularly the “CROATOAN” carving and the lack of a distress cross, as a clear indication that the colonists had voluntarily and safely relocated to Croatoan Island.¹ This island, located south of Roanoke (modern-day Hatteras Island), was the homeland of Manteo, their steadfast Native American ally, and his people, who had maintained friendly relations with the English.¹ White was “greatly joyed” by this token, believing it signified their safety.¹²

His intention was to sail to Croatoan Island immediately to find them. However, a severe storm began to gather, and one of the expedition’s ships lost its anchor cables, making a further coastal search perilous.¹ The captain of the fleet, perhaps more interested in the privateering leg of the voyage, was unwilling to risk his vessels further in the deteriorating weather and with dwindling supplies.¹ Against his will, John White was compelled to return to England, his heart heavy with the knowledge that he had come so close, yet was unable to confirm the fate of his family and the colonists.¹ He would never again have the opportunity to cross the Atlantic, and the mystery of the Lost Colony of Roanoke was thus sealed for centuries. The “CROATOAN” message, while offering a direction, was ultimately an ambiguous sign. The orderly dismantling of houses suggested a planned departure, yet the looted chests introduced an element of uncertainty, leaving the true circumstances of their departure and their ultimate fate shrouded in mystery.

Decoding the Disappearance: Major Theories and Evidence

The enigmatic disappearance of the Roanoke colonists in 1587 has spawned a multitude of theories over the centuries, ranging from plausible explanations grounded in historical context to more speculative, and sometimes fanciful, notions. The primary clues—the “CROATOAN” carving, the absence of a distress signal, and the state of the abandoned settlement—have been interpreted and reinterpreted countless times. Modern archaeological research and a deeper understanding of the region’s indigenous cultures and environmental conditions have helped to refine these theories, though a definitive answer remains elusive.

The following table summarizes the main theories regarding the fate of the Lost Colony, along with the key evidence supporting and challenging each, and their current standing among researchers:

Table 2: Major Theories on the Fate of the Lost Colony

Theory Name	Key Evidence Supporting	Key Evidence Against/Challenges	Current Plausibility/Scholarly View
Assimilation with Croatoan	“CROATOAN” carving without distress cross 1; White’s belief 1; John Lawson’s 1701 account of Hatteras Indians with European traits 1; Archaeological finds on Hatteras Island (16th c. English artifacts, hammer scale).14	Why no immediate, definitive contact or rescue by English in subsequent years if they were thriving with allies?	High. Growing archaeological and historical support makes this a leading explanation for at least a significant portion of the colonists.
Relocation Inland (e.g., Site X)	White’s journal mentioning plans to move “50 miles into the maine” 1; Hidden fort symbol on White’s “La Virginea Pars” map 1; Archaeological finds at “Site X” (16th c. English pottery, artifacts).1	Artifacts at Site X are suggestive but not yet conclusive proof of the entire colony or a long-term settlement; site’s exact nature unclear.	Moderate to High. Plausible that a group moved inland, possibly to a pre-planned location, and may have later assimilated there.
Attack by Hostile Native Americans	History of conflict with some local tribes (e.g., Secotan) 1; George Howe’s murder 1; Later Jamestown accounts of Powhatan claiming to have wiped out English settlers in the region.11	No signs of battle or bodies found at the 1587 Roanoke settlement site by White in 1590 1; Houses were dismantled, not destroyed.1	Moderate. Possible that some colonists were attacked after relocating from Roanoke, but unlikely to be the cause of the initial abandonment.
Spanish Attack	Known Spanish hostility to English colonization in Americas 1; Spanish knowledge of Roanoke’s existence 4; Spain destroyed a French colony (Fort Caroline) earlier.	No definitive Spanish records or archaeological evidence of an attack on the 1587 Roanoke colony; State of the settlement in 1590 doesn’t suggest a military assault.	Low. While a theoretical threat, direct evidence is lacking for this specific colony.
The Dare Stones Narrative	Series of carved stones found 1937-1940, purportedly telling the colonists’ story of hardship, relocation, and eventual demise or assimilation.1	Overwhelming evidence of hoax for most stones (anachronistic language, forged by Bill Eberhardt) 1; Authenticity of the first stone remains debated but largely doubted.	Very Low. Widely considered a hoax, though the first stone occasionally sparks minor debate.
Disease, Starvation, Lost at Sea	Known hardships (food shortages, drought) before White left 1; Possibility of trying to sail back to England in small boats.	Would likely leave some evidence of mass death or struggle if it occurred at the settlement; Unlikely to account for all 115 colonists vanishing without a trace.	Low as a sole explanation for the entire colony’s disappearance, though hardship was undoubtedly a factor in their decisions.

A. The Croatoan Connection: Assimilation with Native Allies?

The theory that the Roanoke colonists relocated to Croatoan Island (now Hatteras Island) and assimilated with the friendly Croatoan people, Manteo’s tribe, stands as one of the most enduring and increasingly supported explanations.¹ The primary contemporary evidence is John White’s own interpretation of the “CROATOAN” carving, coupled with the significant absence of the pre-arranged distress signal.¹ White himself was convinced that this message indicated a safe and voluntary move to live among these allies.¹

Further bolstering this theory is the account of English explorer John Lawson, who, in 1701, over a century after the colonists’ disappearance, visited Hatteras Island.¹ Lawson reported encountering Native Americans who claimed that “several of their ancestors were white people” and that they could “speak out of a book” (read).⁴ He also noted that some members of this Hatteras tribe had gray eyes, a trait uncommon among purely Native American populations but present among Europeans.¹ These Hatteras people also recounted a local legend concerning Sir Walter Raleigh’s ships, which they referred to as a “ghost ship”.¹ Lawson himself came to believe that these individuals were indeed the descendants of the lost Roanoke settlers who had integrated into the Croatoan society.¹

In recent decades, archaeological investigations on Hatteras Island have begun to yield tangible evidence that aligns with this hypothesis. Excavations have uncovered 16th-century European artifacts, including English pottery shards, a gold signet ring, portions of an iron rapier sword, and, significantly, deposits of “hammer scale”.¹⁴ Hammer scale is a distinctive flaky byproduct of traditional iron forging. Archaeologist Mark Horton and his team found this material intermingled with 16th-century Native American artifacts in layers that suggest cohabitation or, at the very least, significant interaction.¹⁵ Since iron forging was a European technology not practiced by the local Algonquian tribes, the presence of hammer scale strongly suggests that English settlers were not only present on Hatteras Island but were actively engaged in blacksmithing, a European craft, potentially within or alongside a Native community.¹⁵ This combination of historical accounts, oral traditions, and emerging archaeological data makes the assimilation theory a compelling explanation for the fate of many, if not all, of the Roanoke colonists. It reframes their story from one of simple vanishing to one of survival through adaptation and cultural merging.

B. Journey Inland: The Mystery of “Site X”

Another significant line of inquiry suggests that at least some of the colonists may have moved inland, away from the immediate coastal region. This theory draws support from John White’s own writings, in which he noted that before his departure in 1587, the colonists had discussed relocating “fiftie miles into the maine” – that is, 50 miles onto the mainland.¹

A remarkable discovery in 2011-2012 lent new impetus to this idea. Researchers at the British Museum, while examining John White’s detailed watercolor map of the region, titled “La Virginea Pars,” noticed a small paper patch covering a section of the map.¹ Using advanced imaging techniques such as X-ray spectroscopy, they found that concealed beneath this patch was a tiny, four-pointed star symbol, drawn in what appeared to be red and blue ink, possibly a form of invisible ink discernible under specific conditions.¹ Such star symbols were commonly used on maps of that era to denote the location of a fort or fortified settlement. The location indicated by this hidden symbol is approximately 50 miles west of Roanoke Island, on the Albemarle Sound near present-day Edenton in Bertie County, North Carolina.¹ This area has been dubbed “Site X” by archaeologists. The deliberate concealment of the fort symbol has led to speculation that it might have been a security measure, perhaps intended to keep the location of a potential inland refuge secret from Spanish spies or other hostile parties.¹

Archaeological excavations conducted by the First Colony Foundation at Site X have indeed uncovered evidence of a 16th-century English presence. Artifacts unearthed include sherds of Surrey-Hampshire Border ware pottery, a type commonly found at the Roanoke and early Jamestown settlements but which ceased to be imported to North America in the early 17th century.¹ Other finds include pieces of a North Devon plain baluster jar (a type of ceramic vessel often used for provisions on sea voyages), iron tenter hooks (used for stretching cloth or hides), priming pans from early flintlock firearms, a copper aglet (a metal tip for laces), and part of an iron buckle.¹⁴ While these findings do not definitively prove that the entire Lost Colony relocated to Site X, they strongly suggest that some English individuals were present in this inland area during the relevant period. This raises the possibility that the colony may have fragmented, with one group heading towards Croatoan Island and another attempting to establish a new settlement or refuge further inland, perhaps at this pre-identified location.

C. The Dare Stones: Messages from the Past or Elaborate Hoax?

The story of the “Dare Stones” adds a dramatic, though largely discredited, chapter to the Roanoke saga. In November 1937, a man named Louis Hammond reportedly found a stone slab, weighing about 21 pounds, near the Chowan River in North Carolina.¹ The stone bore crudely carved inscriptions in an archaic English script. When deciphered, it appeared to be a message from Eleanor White Dare, John White’s daughter. The inscriptions recounted the deaths of her husband, Ananias Dare, and her daughter, Virginia Dare, in 1591, and described the colonists’ move “onlie miserie & warre” 50 miles inland, where many perished from sickness and attacks by “savages,” leaving only seven survivors.¹

This discovery ignited considerable excitement. Dr. Haywood J. Pearce Jr., a history professor at Emory University, became a fervent believer in the stone’s authenticity and, with his father, offered a reward for any further stones that might shed light on the colonists’ fate.¹ This offer led to a flood of subsequent “discoveries.” Over the next few years, more than 40 additional stones were produced, primarily by a Georgia stonecutter named Bill Eberhardt and his associates.¹ These stones collectively narrated a continuing saga of the Roanoke survivors, including their journey southward to Georgia, Eleanor Dare’s subsequent marriage to a Native American man, and her eventual death in 1599.¹

However, scholarly scrutiny soon cast serious doubt on the authenticity of these stones. Most, particularly those supplied by Eberhardt, are now widely considered to be elaborate forgeries.¹ Several factors contributed to their debunking: the language used on many stones contained anachronisms (words or phrases not in use during the Elizabethan era) and exhibited a consistency of spelling that was highly uncharacteristic of the period, when English spelling was far from standardized.¹⁸ The names of colonists mentioned on some stones did not align with the known list of 1587 settlers.¹⁸ Furthermore, investigations into Bill Eberhardt’s background revealed a history of dealing in forged Native American relics, and he even attempted to blackmail Professor Pearce when confronted about the stones’ authenticity.¹⁸ A comprehensive exposé published in the

Saturday Evening Post in April 1941 effectively discredited the Dare Stones in the public eye.¹

While the vast majority of the Dare Stones are accepted as hoaxes, the very first one found by Hammond, often called the “Chowan River Stone,” has occasionally been subject to renewed, albeit cautious, examination. Some analyses of its geological weathering and mineral composition have suggested that its inscriptions could be old, but linguistic experts continue to point to problematic word usage and the unlikelihood of the “EWD” signature for Eleanor White Dare in the 16th century.¹⁸ The Dare Stones episode serves as a compelling cautionary tale in historical investigation, illustrating the allure of tangible “proof” for enduring mysteries and the critical importance of rigorous scientific methodology and skepticism in evaluating such claims.

D. Other Possibilities: Conflict, Disease, or Spanish Intervention?

Beyond the theories of assimilation or planned relocation, other scenarios involving a more violent or tragic end for the colonists have also been considered. Given the history of conflict between the earlier English settlers and some local tribes, particularly the Secotan, an attack by hostile Native Americans is a plausible factor.¹ The murder of George Howe shortly after the 1587 colony’s arrival underscored this ongoing threat.¹ Decades later, accounts from the Jamestown colony (founded in 1607) suggested that the powerful Algonquian chief Powhatan had admitted to orchestrating an attack that wiped out a group of English settlers living in the Chesapeake Bay region. Some historians have speculated that these victims might have been survivors of the Roanoke colony who had moved north, attacked by Powhatan to prevent them from aligning with the new Jamestown arrivals.¹¹

The Spanish also posed a potential threat. Spain viewed English colonial ambitions in North America as an encroachment on its own claims and a base for piracy.¹ The Spanish had knowledge of Raleigh’s Roanoke ventures and had previously destroyed a French Huguenot colony at Fort Caroline (in present-day Florida) in 1565. However, there are no definitive Spanish records or archaeological evidence to suggest that Spanish forces located and destroyed the 1587 Roanoke colony.⁴ The condition of the settlement as found by John White in 1590—with houses dismantled rather than razed—does not strongly support the theory of a sudden military assault by either Native Americans or the Spanish at that specific location.¹

Disease and starvation were undoubtedly severe pressures. The colonists were already facing food shortages and the effects of a significant drought before White’s departure.¹ It is conceivable that these hardships, combined with illnesses, could have decimated the population. However, this alone would not explain the complete disappearance of all colonists and the orderly dismantling of their settlement. Finally, the possibility that some colonists attempted to sail back to England in the colony’s pinnace (a small boat) and were lost at sea cannot be entirely ruled out, though it is unlikely to account for the fate of the entire group. While these “violent end” or catastrophic loss theories are plausible in the harsh context of 16th-century colonization, they generally lack the direct supporting evidence found at the Roanoke site itself that would indicate a massacre or mass death event there. If such events occurred, they likely happened after the colonists had already departed from their 1587 settlement.

The Search Through Centuries: Archaeological Quests and Modern Insights

The mystery of the Lost Colony did not fade with John White’s unsuccessful return. In the early years of the Jamestown settlement, founded in 1607, Captain John Smith and other leaders heard persistent rumors from local Native American tribes about Europeans living further south or inland.⁴ Smith organized several search parties to investigate these claims, but they failed to locate any definitive trace of the Roanoke settlers or their descendants.⁴

For centuries, the fate of the colonists remained largely a matter of speculation and local legend. However, the advent of modern archaeology has opened new avenues for investigation. Systematic digs on Roanoke Island itself have unearthed significant remnants of the 1585 military colony established by Ralph Lane, providing valuable insights into that earlier settlement.² Yet, conclusive archaeological evidence pinpointing the exact location of the 1587 “Lost Colony” settlement on the island has remained elusive. Some researchers now believe that the site of White’s colony may have been lost to shoreline erosion over the past four centuries, potentially lying underwater today.²

As previously discussed, archaeological work on Hatteras Island (the historical Croatoan) has yielded increasingly compelling evidence. Finds by researchers such as Mark Horton and the Croatoan Archaeological Society, including 16th-century English pottery, metal objects like a rapier hilt and a signet ring, and the intriguing discovery of blacksmithing residue (hammer scale) in contexts suggesting interaction with Native American settlements, point strongly towards an English presence and probable assimilation on the island.¹⁴

Simultaneously, investigations at “Site X” in Bertie County, guided by the hidden fort symbol on John White’s map, continue to produce artifacts consistent with a late 16th-century English presence inland.¹⁴ The discovery of specific types of pottery like Surrey-Hampshire Border ware and North Devon baluster jars, along with other domestic and military items, supports the theory that a contingent of colonists may have moved to this location.¹⁴

Genetic research has also been explored as a potential tool. Attempts have been made to trace possible descendants of the Roanoke colonists through DNA analysis, particularly among members of the Lumbee tribe of North Carolina and other groups with oral traditions of mixed European and Native American ancestry and shared surnames with some of the colonists.² However, these studies have generally proven complex and inconclusive, hampered by the passage of time and the intricate intermingling of various populations.

Synthesizing the available evidence, the most compelling current understanding suggests that the Roanoke colonists were not “lost” in the sense of vanishing without a trace, but rather that their community fragmented and its members pursued different paths to survival. It is highly probable that a significant portion of the colonists, facing White’s prolonged absence, severe drought, dwindling supplies, and ongoing threats, made their way to Croatoan Island.¹ There, they likely integrated with the friendly Croatoan people, gradually assimilating into their society, as suggested by White’s own interpretation, Lawson’s later account, and the archaeological finds on Hatteras.¹⁵ Another group, possibly smaller, may have ventured inland, perhaps towards the location now known as Site X, in an attempt to establish a new, more secure settlement, or to seek refuge with other allied Native American groups.¹ Over time, these individuals too would have likely assimilated, intermarried, and become part of the existing indigenous cultural landscape. The narrative of the Lost Colony is thus evolving from a simple tale of disappearance to a more nuanced story of dispersal, adaptation, and cultural fusion, demonstrating the resilience of people facing extraordinary challenges.

Conclusion: Piecing Together the Roanoke Puzzle

The story of the Lost Colony of Roanoke remains one of America’s most captivating historical mysteries, a haunting echo from the earliest days of European attempts to settle the North American continent. For over 400 years, the image of an abandoned settlement and the cryptic carving “CROATOAN” have fueled an enduring quest for answers. While a single, definitive explanation for the fate of all 115 colonists remains elusive, the diligent work of historians and archaeologists, coupled with re-examinations of primary sources, has brought us closer to understanding their probable destiny.

The strongest lines of evidence point not towards a singular catastrophic event at the Roanoke site, but towards a more complex scenario of dispersal and assimilation. The colonists, faced with Governor John White’s prolonged absence and the harsh realities of their isolated existence, likely made pragmatic decisions to ensure their survival. A significant contingent almost certainly relocated to Croatoan (Hatteras) Island, integrating with the friendly Native American population there, a theory supported by White’s own interpretation, John Lawson’s later observations, and increasingly by archaeological discoveries of 16th-century English artifacts on the island. Simultaneously, it is plausible that another group, or perhaps several smaller parties, ventured inland, potentially towards the area now known as “Site X,” seeking new opportunities or alliances, and eventually merging with other indigenous communities.

The significance of the Roanoke Colony extends far beyond its status as an unsolved puzzle. It serves as a poignant testament to the immense challenges, perils, and often tragic consequences of early European colonial ventures. The story underscores the critical importance of logistics, leadership, and, crucially, the complex and often fraught nature of interactions between European newcomers and the established Native American societies. Roanoke is a microcosm of larger historical processes: imperial ambition confronting unfamiliar environments, cultural misunderstandings leading to conflict, the devastating impact of introduced diseases, and the varied, often unrecorded, ways in which different cultures met, clashed, and sometimes blended.

The colonists of Roanoke were not merely lost; they were participants in a pivotal moment of encounter and transformation. Their story continues to evolve as new evidence comes to light, reminding us that history is a dynamic field of inquiry, constantly challenging us to look beyond simple narratives and embrace more complex truths. The final chapter of the Roanoke saga may never be fully written, but the ongoing search for answers continues to illuminate the earliest foundations of American history.

What do you believe happened to the Lost Colony of Roanoke? Share your theories in the comments below!

 

 

References

1. The Lost Colony of Roanoke.docx
2. What Happened to the Lost Colony at Roanoke? | HowStuffWorks, accessed June 13, 2025, https://history.howstuffworks.com/history-vs-myth/roanoke-colony.htm
3. John White Returns to Roanoke; an excerpt from “The fift voyage of Master John White into the West Indies and parts of America called Virginia, in the yeere 1590” (1600) – Encyclopedia Virginia, accessed June 13, 2025, https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/john-white-returns-to-roanoke-an-excerpt-from-the-fift-voyage-of-master-john-white-into-the-west-indies-and-parts-of-america-called-virginia-in-the-yeere-1590-1600/
4. What We Now Know About the Lost Colony of Roanoke – History Guild, accessed June 13, 2025, https://historyguild.org/what-we-now-know-about-the-lost-colony-of-roanoke/
5. Sir Walter Raleigh – Fort Raleigh National Historic Site (U.S. National Park Service), accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.nps.gov/fora/learn/historyculture/sir-walter-raleigh.htm
6. The Lost Colony – Fort Raleigh National Historic Site (U.S. National …, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.nps.gov/fora/learn/historyculture/the-lost-colony.htm
7. History of Roanoke Voyages, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.roanokeisland.com/plan-your-visit/history-roanoke-voyages
8. Primary Sources – Jamestown and Roanoke Colonies: A Resource Guide, accessed June 13, 2025, https://guides.loc.gov/jamestown-roanoke-colonies/primary-sources
9. Historical Documents & Research | First Colony Foundation, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.firstcolonyfoundation.org/history/historical-documents-research/
10. Roanoke Colony Timeline – World History Encyclopedia, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.worldhistory.org/timeline/Roanoke_Colony/
11. What Happened To The Lost Colony? – Colonial Williamsburg, accessed June 13, 2025, http://www.colonialwilliamsburg.org/discover/resource-hub/trend-tradition-magazine/trend-tradition-spring-2025/lost-colony/
12. Commentary: Why you can’t ignore Hatteras Island in the Lost Colony story, accessed June 13, 2025, https://islandfreepress.org/hatteras-island-features/commentary-why-you-cant-ignore-hatteras-island-in-the-lost-colony-story/
13. The Lost Colony of Roanoke sponsored by Sir Walter Raleigh – Williamsburg Private Tours, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.williamsburgprivatetours.com/The%20Lost%20Colony.htm
14. Archaeologists Find New Clues to “Lost Colony” Mystery – History.com, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.history.com/articles/archaeologists-find-new-clues-to-lost-colony-mystery
15. ‘Lost Colony’ of Roanoke may have assimilated into Indigenous society, archaeologist claims — but not everyone is convinced | Live Science, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/lost-colony-of-roanoke-may-have-assimilated-into-indigenous-society-archaeologist-claims-but-not-everyone-is-convinced
16. Historic Map Shines Light On America’s Great 400-Year-Old Mystery – Newsweek, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/lost-colony-roanoke-map-mystery-2021391
17. AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL BRIEF FOR SITE X – First Colony Foundation, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.firstcolonyfoundation.org/documents/site_x_brief.pdf
18. The Dare Stones | NCpedia, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.ncpedia.org/dare-stones
19. The Dare Stone – Hoax Or Message From The “Lost” Roanoke Colony? | IFLScience, accessed June 13, 2025, https://www.iflscience.com/the-dare-stone-hoax-or-message-from-the-lost-roanoke-colony-69058
20. Map Sheds Light on Mystery of the Lost American Colony of Roanoke – Colombia One, accessed June 13, 2025, https://colombiaone.com/2025/01/28/map-mystery-roanoke-colony/
21. Salmon Creek – Site X | North Carolina Land and Water Fund – NC.gov, accessed June 13, 2025, https://nclwf.nc.gov/funded-projects/land-acquisition-highlights/salmon-creek-site-x